← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2026-75804 · published 29 September 2026

CVE-2026-75804: Openssl allocation without limits vulnerability

OOpenssl · Openssl

Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection level flow control for streams. Remote peers may send more bytes as long as they fit within the stream flow control limits. Impact summary: A malicious remote peer may exploit the lack of connection flow control for streams to make the QUIC stack receive ~100MB of memory instead of 768 KiB (default flow control window size). CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: The local QUIC stack advertises two flow control limits to its remote peer: stream flow control limit and connection flow control limit. The remote peer must follow both limits when transmitting stream data. Whenever the local QUIC stack receives a stream frame, it validates that the size of the received stream frame stays within flow control limits. If either limit is exceeded (stream level or connection level), then the QUIC stack must close the connection with a flow control error. The vulnerable OpenSSL QUIC stack enforces the stream-level but not the connection-level limit. To exploit the issue, three conditions must be met: - the remote peer opens several streams - each stream must stay within the stream-level flow control limit - there must be no zero-offset byte sent on any of the streams (to prevent the vulnerable QUIC stack from consuming data). By meeting the conditions above, the remote peer may make the local stack allocate 2 x MAX_STREAMS x (stream flow control limit) bytes of memory. MAX_STREAMS defaults to 100, and the limit applies to both bidirectional and unidirectional streams, making it 200 in total. The default flow control window for a stream is 512kB. The remote peer may force the vulnerable QUIC stack to allocate 100MB of heap per connection. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

5.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium EPSS 0.53% · top 54.7% CWE-770 · Allocation without limits
5.3CVSS 3.1 base score
0.53%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
1Affected product versions listed by NVD
5References
8 Oct 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection level flow control for streams. Remote peers may send more bytes as long as they fit within the stream flow control limits. Impact summary: A malicious remote peer may exploit the lack of connection flow control for streams to make the QUIC stack receive ~100MB of memory instead of 768 KiB (default flow control window size). CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: The local QUIC stack advertises two flow control limits to its remote peer: stream flow control limit and connection flow control limit. The remote peer must follow both limits when transmitting stream data. Whenever the local QUIC stack receives a stream frame, it validates that the size of the received stream frame stays within flow control limits. If either limit is exceeded (stream level or connection level), then the QUIC stack must close the connection with a flow control error. The vulnerable OpenSSL QUIC stack enforces the stream-level but not the connection-level limit. To exploit the issue, three conditions must be met: - the remote peer opens several streams - each stream must stay within the stream-level flow control limit - there must be no zero-offset byte sent on any of the streams (to prevent the vulnerable QUIC stack from consuming data). By meeting the conditions above, the remote peer may make the local stack allocate 2 x MAX_STREAMS x (stream flow control limit) bytes of memory. MAX_STREAMS defaults to 100, and the limit applies to both bidirectional and unidirectional streams, making it 200 in total. The default flow control window for a stream is 512kB. The remote peer may force the vulnerable QUIC stack to allocate 100MB of heap per connection. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Affected products

1 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

LinkTags
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2e8f54666b3fb7b05ff5f58aa6cac9285163654e Patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4533ee8a5686c953ed3b644738ac4bdf20806538 Patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/64d3102fb5b54311e92517f26ba00169d719e74a Patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f9eaecf5bdd6692da052bc65b0332af2a938ac03 Patch
https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt Vendor Advisory

Track CVE-2026-75804 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

7.5CVE-2014-0160OpenSSL TLS/DTLS Heartbeat Extension Out-of-Bounds Read (Heartbleed)OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g mishandles Heartbeat Extension packets in its TLS and DTLS implementations, causing an out-of-bounds read of process memo…KEVEPSS 100%analysed10.0CVE-2009-3245Openssl improper input validation vulnerabilityOpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c, (2) crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c, (3) c…EPSS 5.8%10.0CVE-2006-3738OpenSSL SSL_get_shared_ciphers buffer overflow via long cipher listOpenSSL versions before 0.9.7l and 0.9.8d contain a buffer overflow in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function, triggered by a long list of ciphers. The …EPSS 50%analysed9.8CVE-2026-63073Openssl vulnerabilityIssue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_da…EPSS 1.2%9.8CVE-2026-31789Openssl out-of-bounds write vulnerabilityIssue summary: Converting an excessively large OCTET STRING value to a hexadecimal string leads to a heap buffer overflow on 32 bit platforms. Impact…EPSS 0.25%9.8CVE-2025-9230Openssl out-of-bounds read vulnerabilityIssue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write. I…EPSS 1.8%9.8CVE-2024-4741Openssl use after free vulnerabilityIssue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations Impact …EPSS 3.3%9.8CVE-2022-2274OpenSSL 3.0.4 RSA AVX512IFMA memory corruptionOpenSSL 3.0.4 introduced a bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting AVX512IFMA instructions, causing 2048-bit private key operations …EPSS 48%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2026-75804), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-11-13). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.