← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2026-48086 · published 6 August 2026

CVE-2026-48086: Improper privilege management vulnerability

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN promotes themselves to platform-wide GLOBAL_ADMIN through a single PUT request. The role-update handler accepts the `GLOBAL_ADMIN` enum value from any tenant admin updating their own tenant's staff. No policy check enforces that "only an existing GLOBAL_ADMIN may grant GLOBAL_ADMIN", so the schema validation IS the authorization decision. After re-login, the JWT contains the new role and the formerly-tenant-scoped admin reaches every other tenant on the platform. On the hosted OpenReception service this is a scope-changed escalation: a single customer-side tenant administrator gains full platform-wide administrative control over all other tenants' configuration, users, staff records, operational metadata, and tenant lifecycle. Plaintext appointment contents remain subject to the E2E model unless chained with the staff-crypto poisoning issue (V-4) or with staff-passkey hijacking (V-1). On a single-tenant self-hosted deployment it is still a privilege escalation because TENANT_ADMIN should not be able to create new tenants, modify global configuration, or manage other administrators. The same handler also accepts updates targeted at any colleague within the tenant. A tenant admin can promote a separate collaborator account instead of themselves, leaving their own audit trail clean while the platform-wide breach happens through a separate identity. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.

9.9 CVSS 3.1 Critical EPSS 0.44% · top 64.1% CWE-269 · Improper privilege management Deferred
9.9CVSS 3.1 base score
0.44%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
0Affected product versions listed by NVD
3References
8 Sep 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN promotes themselves to platform-wide GLOBAL_ADMIN through a single PUT request. The role-update handler accepts the `GLOBAL_ADMIN` enum value from any tenant admin updating their own tenant's staff. No policy check enforces that "only an existing GLOBAL_ADMIN may grant GLOBAL_ADMIN", so the schema validation IS the authorization decision. After re-login, the JWT contains the new role and the formerly-tenant-scoped admin reaches every other tenant on the platform. On the hosted OpenReception service this is a scope-changed escalation: a single customer-side tenant administrator gains full platform-wide administrative control over all other tenants' configuration, users, staff records, operational metadata, and tenant lifecycle. Plaintext appointment contents remain subject to the E2E model unless chained with the staff-crypto poisoning issue (V-4) or with staff-passkey hijacking (V-1). On a single-tenant self-hosted deployment it is still a privilege escalation because TENANT_ADMIN should not be able to create new tenants, modify global configuration, or manage other administrators. The same handler also accepts updates targeted at any colleague within the tenant. A tenant admin can promote a separate collaborator account instead of themselves, leaving their own audit trail clean while the platform-wide breach happens through a separate identity. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

Track CVE-2026-48086 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

9.9CVE-2026-84869ScreenConnect client allows unauthorized file transfer and execution in remote sessionsA flaw in the ConnectWise ScreenConnect client lets files be transferred and executed inside an active remote session without authorization or Host c…KEVEPSS 0.92%analysed9.8CVE-2026-46817Oracle E-Business Suite Payments missing authentication allows takeoverOracle Payments in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.2.3 through 12.2.15 contains an easily exploitable flaw in the File Transmission component. An unauthen…KEVEPSS 0.81%analysed7.8CVE-2026-21533Windows Remote Desktop improper privilege management allows local elevationWindows Remote Desktop contains an improper privilege management flaw (CWE-269) that lets an authorized attacker elevate privileges locally. It affec…KEVEPSS 4.1%analysed5.1CVE-2024-8068Citrix Session Recording privilege escalation to NetworkServiceCitrix Session Recording contains an improper privilege management flaw (CWE-269) that lets an authenticated attacker escalate to the NetworkService …KEVEPSS 3.5%analysed9.8CVE-2024-49035Microsoft Partner Center improper access control allows privilege elevationPartner.Microsoft.com contains an improper access control flaw (CWE-269) that lets an unauthenticated attacker elevate privileges over the network. M…KEVEPSS 1.3%analysed8.8CVE-2013-0643Adobe Flash Player Firefox sandbox privilege escalationAdobe Flash Player's Firefox sandbox does not properly restrict privileges, allowing crafted SWF content to escape the sandbox and run code with high…KEVEPSS 11%analysed7.8CVE-2024-38014Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege FlawCVE-2024-38014 is an elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Windows Installer, classified as improper privilege management (CWE-269). It affects…KEVEPSS 6.3%analysed7.8CVE-2024-26169Windows Error Reporting Service privilege escalation flawCVE-2024-26169 is an improper privilege management vulnerability in the Windows Error Reporting Service, classified under CWE-269. A local attacker w…KEVEPSS 4.0%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2026-48086), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-27). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.