← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2026-32614 · published 16 March 2026

CVE-2026-32614: Improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability

Go ShangMi (Commercial Cryptography) Library (GMSM) is a cryptographic library that covers the Chinese commercial cryptographic public algorithms SM2/SM3/SM4/SM9/ZUC. Prior to 0.41.1, the current SM9 decryption implementation contains an infinity-point ciphertext forgery vulnerability. The root cause is that, during decryption, the elliptic-curve point C1 in the ciphertext is only deserialized and checked to be on the curve, but the implementation does not explicitly reject the point at infinity. In the current implementation, an attacker can construct C1 as the point at infinity, causing the bilinear pairing result to degenerate into the identity element in the GT group. As a result, a critical part of the key derivation input becomes a predictable constant. An attacker who only knows the target user's UID can derive the decryption key material and then forge a ciphertext that passes the integrity check. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.41.1.

7.5 CVSS 3.1 High EPSS 0.23% · top 87.6% CWE-347 · Improper verification of cryptographic signature Deferred
7.5CVSS 3.1 base score
0.23%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
0Affected product versions listed by NVD
1References
17 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

Go ShangMi (Commercial Cryptography) Library (GMSM) is a cryptographic library that covers the Chinese commercial cryptographic public algorithms SM2/SM3/SM4/SM9/ZUC. Prior to 0.41.1, the current SM9 decryption implementation contains an infinity-point ciphertext forgery vulnerability. The root cause is that, during decryption, the elliptic-curve point C1 in the ciphertext is only deserialized and checked to be on the curve, but the implementation does not explicitly reject the point at infinity. In the current implementation, an attacker can construct C1 as the point at infinity, causing the bilinear pairing result to degenerate into the identity element in the GT group. As a result, a critical part of the key derivation input becomes a predictable constant. An attacker who only knows the target user's UID can derive the decryption key material and then forge a ciphertext that passes the integrity check. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.41.1.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

LinkTags
https://github.com/emmansun/gmsm/security/advisories/GHSA-5xxp-2vrj-x855

Track CVE-2026-32614 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

10.0CVE-2026-5430Wso2 api control plane improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerabilityThe JWT authentication mechanism accepts tokens signed with algorithms other than those explicitly configured or supported. This allows an attacker t…KEVEPSS 0.59%9.5CVE-2026-48558SimpleHelp OIDC authentication bypass via unverified token signatureSimpleHelp 5.5.15 and earlier and 6.0 pre-release versions accept OIDC identity tokens without verifying their cryptographic signature. When OIDC is …KEVEPSS 5.7%analysed9.8CVE-2025-59718Fortinet FortiOS/FortiProxy SAML signature check bypass in FortiCloud SSOFortiOS, FortiProxy and FortiSwitchManager fail to properly verify the cryptographic signature of SAML responses used for FortiCloud SSO login. An un…KEVEPSS 68%analysed4.6CVE-2025-47827IGEL OS Secure Boot bypass via improper signature verificationIGEL OS before version 11 fails to properly verify a cryptographic signature in the igel-flash-driver module, allowing Secure Boot to be bypassed. A …KEVEPSS 4.9%analysed10.0CVE-2020-2021PAN-OS SAML signature verification bypass allows authentication bypassPAN-OS fails to properly verify SAML signatures when SAML authentication is enabled and the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is unchec…KEVEPSS 4.4%analysed5.5CVE-2013-3900Windows WinVerifyTrust Authenticode signature verification RCECVE-2013-3900 is a remote code execution flaw in how the Windows WinVerifyTrust function verifies Authenticode signatures on portable executable file…KEVEPSS 45%analysed7.8CVE-2020-1464Windows file signature validation spoofing allows loading of improperly signed filesWindows incorrectly validates file signatures, so a crafted file can be treated as properly signed. This lets an attacker bypass the security feature…KEVEPSS 39%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2026-32614), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-26). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.