← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2026-27614 · published 25 February 2026

CVE-2026-27614: Bugsink cross-site scripting vulnerability

Bugsink · Bugsink

Bugsink is a self-hosted error tracking tool. In versions prior to 2.0.13, an unauthenticated attacker who can submit events to a Bugsink project can store arbitrary JavaScript in an event. The payload executes only if a user explicitly views the affected Stacktrace in the web UI. When Pygments returns more lines than it was given (a known upstream quirk that triggers with Ruby heredoc-style input), `_pygmentize_lines()` in `theme/templatetags/issues.py:75-77` falls back to returning the raw input lines. `mark_safe()` at line 111-113 is then applied unconditionally - including to those unsanitized raw lines. Since DSN endpoints are public by Sentry protocol, no account is needed to inject. The payload sits in the database until an admin looks at the event. Successful exploitation requires that the attacker to be able to submit events to the project (i.e. knows the DSN or can access a client that uses it), the Bugsink ingest endpoint is reachable to the attacker, and an administrator explicitly views the crafted event in the UI. Under those conditions, the attacker can execute JavaScript in the administrator’s browser and act with that user’s privileges within Bugsink. Version 2.0.13 fixes the vulnerability.

6.1 CVSS 3.1 Medium EPSS 0.43% · top 65.2% CWE-79 · Cross-site scripting
6.1CVSS 3.1 base score
0.43%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
1Affected product versions listed by NVD
3References, 1 tagged exploit
17 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

Bugsink is a self-hosted error tracking tool. In versions prior to 2.0.13, an unauthenticated attacker who can submit events to a Bugsink project can store arbitrary JavaScript in an event. The payload executes only if a user explicitly views the affected Stacktrace in the web UI. When Pygments returns more lines than it was given (a known upstream quirk that triggers with Ruby heredoc-style input), `_pygmentize_lines()` in `theme/templatetags/issues.py:75-77` falls back to returning the raw input lines. `mark_safe()` at line 111-113 is then applied unconditionally - including to those unsanitized raw lines. Since DSN endpoints are public by Sentry protocol, no account is needed to inject. The payload sits in the database until an admin looks at the event. Successful exploitation requires that the attacker to be able to submit events to the project (i.e. knows the DSN or can access a client that uses it), the Bugsink ingest endpoint is reachable to the attacker, and an administrator explicitly views the crafted event in the UI. Under those conditions, the attacker can execute JavaScript in the administrator’s browser and act with that user’s privileges within Bugsink. Version 2.0.13 fixes the vulnerability.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected products

1 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

Track CVE-2026-27614 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

7.1CVE-2026-40162Bugsink improper input validation vulnerabilityBugsink is a self-hosted error tracking tool. In 2.1.0, an authenticated file write vulnerability was identified in Bugsink 2.1.0 in the artifact bun…EPSS 0.51%6.1CVE-2026-42897Microsoft Exchange Server XSS enables spoofingMicrosoft Exchange Server and Exchange Server Subscription Edition fail to neutralize input during web page generation, a cross-site scripting flaw (…KEVEPSS 0.52%analysed6.1CVE-2025-48700Zimbra Classic UI stored XSS via crafted email HTMLZimbra Collaboration Suite Classic UI fails to properly sanitize HTML content in email messages, allowing crafted tag structures and attribute values…KEVEPSS 1.7%analysed6.1CVE-2025-66376Zimbra Collaboration Classic UI stored XSS via CSS @import in emailZimbra Collaboration Suite 10 before 10.0.18 and 10.1 before 10.1.13 allows stored cross-site scripting in the Classic UI through CSS @import directi…KEVEPSS 20%analysed6.1CVE-2025-68461Roundcube Webmail XSS via SVG animate tagRoundcube Webmail before 1.5.12 and 1.6 before 1.6.12 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting through the animate tag in an SVG document. Because the f…KEVEPSS 27%analysed10.0CVE-2026-22769Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines hardcoded credential flawDell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines versions prior to 6.0.3.1 HF1 contain a hardcoded credential vulnerability (CWE-798). An unauthenticated remot…KEVEPSS 13%analysed7.1CVE-2025-14611Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox hardcoded AES key enables file inclusionCentreStack and Triofox before 16.12.10420.56791 use hardcoded values in their AES cryptoscheme, weakening protection for publicly exposed endpoints.…KEVEPSS 53%analysed5.4CVE-2021-26829OpenPLC ScadaBR stored XSS via system_settings.shtmOpenPLC ScadaBR through 0.9.1 on Linux and through 1.12.4 on Windows allows stored cross-site scripting through system_settings.shtm. Because the inj…KEVEPSS 48%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2026-27614), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-27). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.