← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2023-3446 · published 19 July 2023

CVE-2023-3446: Openssl inefficient regular expression (redos) vulnerability

OOpenssl · Openssl

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the '-check' option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

5.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium EPSS 6.5% · top 6.4% CWE-606 · CWE-606CWE-1333 · Inefficient regular expression (ReDoS)
5.3CVSS 3.1 base score
6.5%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
1Affected product versions listed by NVD
18References
17 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the '-check' option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Affected products

1 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

LinkTags
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb Mailing ListPatchVendor Advisory
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528 Mailing ListPatchVendor Advisory
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c Broken LinkVendor Advisory
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23 Mailing ListPatchVendor Advisory
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt Vendor Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb Mailing ListPatchVendor Advisory
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528 Mailing ListPatchVendor Advisory
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c Broken LinkVendor Advisory
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23 Mailing ListPatchVendor Advisory
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230803-0011/
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt Vendor Advisory

Track CVE-2023-3446 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

7.5CVE-2014-0160OpenSSL TLS/DTLS Heartbeat Extension Out-of-Bounds Read (Heartbleed)OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g mishandles Heartbeat Extension packets in its TLS and DTLS implementations, causing an out-of-bounds read of process memo…KEVEPSS 100%analysed10.0CVE-2009-3245Openssl improper input validation vulnerabilityOpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c, (2) crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c, (3) c…EPSS 6.5%10.0CVE-2006-3738OpenSSL SSL_get_shared_ciphers buffer overflow via long cipher listOpenSSL versions before 0.9.7l and 0.9.8d contain a buffer overflow in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function, triggered by a long list of ciphers. The …EPSS 49%analysed9.8CVE-2026-63073Openssl vulnerabilityIssue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_da…EPSS 1.2%9.8CVE-2026-31789Openssl out-of-bounds write vulnerabilityIssue summary: Converting an excessively large OCTET STRING value to a hexadecimal string leads to a heap buffer overflow on 32 bit platforms. Impact…EPSS 0.33%9.8CVE-2022-2274OpenSSL 3.0.4 RSA AVX512IFMA memory corruptionOpenSSL 3.0.4 introduced a bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting AVX512IFMA instructions, causing 2048-bit private key operations …EPSS 46%analysed9.8CVE-2021-3711OpenSSL SM2 decryption buffer overflowOpenSSL's SM2 decryption code miscalculates the output buffer size needed by EVP_PKEY_decrypt(), so the first sizing call can return a value smaller …EPSS 88%analysed9.8CVE-2016-6309OpenSSL 1.1.0a statem use-after-free on realloc in TLS session handlingOpenSSL 1.1.0a's statem/statem.c fails to account for memory-block movement after a realloc call, leaving a dangling pointer that can be used after f…EPSS 70%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2023-3446), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-26). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.