← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2022-2053 · published 5 August 2022

CVE-2022-2053: Redhat integration camel k uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability

Redhat · Integration Camel K

When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2.

7.5 CVSS 3.1 High EPSS 1.1% · top 36.6% CWE-400 · Uncontrolled resource consumption
7.5CVSS 3.1 base score
1.1%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
3Affected product versions listed by NVD
4References
17 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Affected products

3 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

Track CVE-2022-2053 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

7.5CVE-2023-44487HTTP/2 Rapid Reset stream cancellation denial of serviceThe HTTP/2 protocol permits a client to cancel many streams quickly, and the server's handling of those resets consumes disproportionate resources. T…KEVEPSS 100%analysed9.8CVE-2020-1745Redhat undertow improper authorization vulnerabilityA file inclusion vulnerability was found in the AJP connector enabled with a default AJP configuration port of 8009 in Undertow version 2.0.29.Final …EPSS 5.0%9.8CVE-2019-14892Fasterxml jackson-databind information exposure vulnerabilityA flaw was discovered in jackson-databind in versions before 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5 and 2.6.7.3, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of a mal…EPSS 5.6%9.8CVE-2019-10212Redhat undertow sensitive information in log file vulnerabilityA flaw was found in, all under 2.0.20, in the Undertow DEBUG log for io.undertow.request.security. If enabled, an attacker could abuse this flaw to o…EPSS 1.9%9.8CVE-2019-3888Redhat undertow sensitive information in log file vulnerabilityA vulnerability was found in Undertow web server before 2.0.21. An information exposure of plain text credentials through log files because Connector…EPSS 3.0%9.8CVE-2014-0121Hawtio improper authentication vulnerabilityThe admin terminal in Hawt.io does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the k parameter.EPSS 3.9%9.8CVE-2015-7501Red Hat JBoss Java deserialization allows remote command executionMultiple Red Hat JBoss products deserialize untrusted Java objects and, through the Apache Commons Collections library, allow remote attackers to exe…EPSS 86%analysed9.6CVE-2025-12543Redhat build of apache camel improper input validation vulnerabilityA flaw was found in the Undertow HTTP server core, which is used in WildFly, JBoss EAP, and other Java applications. The Undertow library fails to pr…EPSS 1.4%

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2022-2053), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-10-02). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.