← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2022-1434 · published 3 May 2022

CVE-2022-1434: Openssl broken cryptographic algorithm vulnerability

OOpenssl · Openssl

The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

5.9 CVSS 3.1 Medium EPSS 1.1% · top 36.8% CWE-327 · Broken cryptographic algorithm
5.9CVSS 3.1 base score, v2 4.3
1.1%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
26Affected product versions listed by NVD
8References
17 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Affected products

26 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

Track CVE-2022-1434 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

10.0CVE-2021-44228Apache Log4j2 JNDI lookup remote code executionApache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) do not protect against attacker-controlled LDAP and other JNDI …KEVEPSS 100%analysed8.8CVE-2023-41993Apple WebKit improper check allows arbitrary code executionCVE-2023-41993 is a WebKit flaw where processing web content can lead to arbitrary code execution, addressed with improved checks. Apple states it is…KEVEPSS 24%analysed8.8CVE-2023-4863libwebp Heap Buffer Overflow via Crafted WebP ImageA heap buffer overflow in libwebp allows an out-of-bounds memory write when processing a crafted WebP image. It affects Google Chrome before 116.0.58…KEVEPSS 100%analysed8.1CVE-2018-11776Apache Struts namespace handling flaw enables remote code executionApache Struts 2.3 through 2.3.34 and 2.5 through 2.5.16 can execute remote code when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is enabled and results or url tags are…KEVEPSS 100%analysed8.1CVE-2017-12617Apache Tomcat Default Servlet JSP upload leads to remote code executionApache Tomcat with HTTP PUT enabled (for example, the Default servlet readonly parameter set to false) allows an attacker to upload a JSP file throug…KEVEPSS 100%analysed7.8CVE-2024-1086Linux kernel nf_tables use-after-free allows local privilege escalationThe Linux kernel's netfilter nf_tables component has a use-after-free in nft_verdict_init(), where positive drop errors are accepted and nf_hook_slow…KEVEPSS 28%analysed7.8CVE-2021-22555Linux kernel netfilter x_tables heap out-of-bounds writeA heap out-of-bounds write exists in the Linux kernel netfilter x_tables code (net/netfilter/x_tables.c), present since v2.6.19-rc1. A local attacker…KEVEPSS 79%analysed7.8CVE-2021-3156Sudo off-by-one heap overflow allows root privilege escalationSudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. Triggering it via 'sudoedit -s' with a command-line argumen…KEVEPSS 100%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2022-1434), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-26). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.