Vulnerability record · CVE-2020-8450 · published 4 February 2020
CVE-2020-8450: Squid reverse proxy buffer overflow via incorrect buffer management
Squid Cache · Squid
Squid before 4.10 mishandles buffers, allowing a remote client to trigger a buffer overflow when Squid operates as a reverse proxy. The flaw is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) rooted in incorrect buffer size calculation (CWE-131), and it matters because it is network-reachable without authentication and affects a widely deployed proxy component.
Description
An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.10. Due to incorrect buffer management, a remote client can cause a buffer overflow in a Squid instance acting as a reverse proxy.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Automated analysis
high priorityNetwork-reachable, unauthenticated buffer overflow in a widely deployed proxy with a very high EPSS score, though no KEV listing or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation is recorded.
What it is
Squid before 4.10 mishandles buffers, allowing a remote client to trigger a buffer overflow when Squid operates as a reverse proxy. The flaw is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) rooted in incorrect buffer size calculation (CWE-131), and it matters because it is network-reachable without authentication and affects a widely deployed proxy component.
Impact
An attacker can corrupt memory in the Squid process, which may lead to a crash or, depending on memory layout, code execution in the proxy's context. CVSS 3.1 rates confidentiality, integrity and availability impact as low (7.3 HIGH).
Attack surface
Reachable over the network by any remote client that can send requests to a Squid instance configured as a reverse proxy; the CVSS vector shows no privileges (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) required. Only reverse-proxy deployments are described as affected.
Exploitation
Not listed in CISA KEV and no ransomware association is recorded, but EPSS is very high (0.7179 probability, 99.394 percentile), indicating substantial predicted exploitation activity. References are vendor advisories and patches only; no public exploit or in-the-wild report is cited in the record.
What to do
- Upgrade Squid to 4.10 or later, or apply the vendor patches referenced in SQUID-2020_1 for the 3.5 and 4 branches.
- Apply distribution updates for Ubuntu (USN-4289-1), Debian (DSA-4682), openSUSE, Fedora and Gentoo (GLSA 202003-34) where Squid is packaged.
- If patching is delayed, restrict network access to reverse-proxy listeners to trusted clients and avoid exposing Squid reverse proxy directly to the internet.
- Monitor vendor advisories for NetApp and other third-party products that bundle Squid and apply their updates.
Detection
- Watch Squid process crashes or restarts, especially abnormal termination signals, on hosts running reverse-proxy configurations.
- Alert on core dumps or memory-corruption indicators from the squid binary and correlate with inbound request volume or unusual request patterns.
- Track Squid version inventory and flag any instance below 4.10 that is configured as a reverse proxy.
- Review proxy access logs for anomalous or malformed requests arriving at reverse-proxy listeners around the time of any crash.
This assessment is produced automatically and is not human-reviewed. Verify against the vendor advisory before acting on it.
Affected products
5 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.
References
Track CVE-2020-8450 inside VULONE
Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.
Related vulnerabilities
Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.
Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2020-8450), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-26). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.