← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2017-3732 · published 4 May 2017

CVE-2017-3732: Openssl information exposure vulnerability

OOpenssl · Openssl

There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.

5.9 CVSS 3.1 Medium EPSS 15% · top 3.3% CWE-200 · Information exposure
5.9CVSS 3.1 base score, v2 4.3
15%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
2Affected product versions listed by NVD
36References
17 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Affected products

2 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

LinkTags
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html PatchThird Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html PatchThird Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html PatchThird Party Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95814 Third Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037717 Third Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2568 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2575 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2713 Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a59b90bf491410f1f2bc4540cc21f1980fd14c5b Patch
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-17:02.openssl.asc Third Party Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-07 Third Party Advisory
https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03838en_us Third Party Advisory
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170126.txt Vendor Advisory
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html PatchThird Party Advisory
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-04 Third Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html PatchThird Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html PatchThird Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html PatchThird Party Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95814 Third Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037717 Third Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2568 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2575 Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2713 Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a59b90bf491410f1f2bc4540cc21f1980fd14c5b Patch
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-17:02.openssl.asc Third Party Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-07 Third Party Advisory
https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03838en_us Third Party Advisory
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170126.txt Vendor Advisory
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html PatchThird Party Advisory
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-04 Third Party Advisory

Track CVE-2017-3732 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

7.5CVE-2023-44487HTTP/2 Rapid Reset stream cancellation denial of serviceThe HTTP/2 protocol permits a client to cancel many streams quickly, and the server's handling of those resets consumes disproportionate resources. T…KEVEPSS 100%analysed7.5CVE-2014-0160OpenSSL TLS/DTLS Heartbeat Extension Out-of-Bounds Read (Heartbleed)OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g mishandles Heartbeat Extension packets in its TLS and DTLS implementations, causing an out-of-bounds read of process memo…KEVEPSS 100%analysed10.0CVE-2026-21636Nodejs node.js improper access control vulnerabilityA flaw in Node.js's permission model allows Unix Domain Socket (UDS) connections to bypass network restrictions when `--permission` is enabled. Even …EPSS 0.88%10.0CVE-2015-0278Fedoraproject fedora vulnerabilitylibuv before 0.10.34 does not properly drop group privileges, which allows context-dependent attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.EPSS 3.2%10.0CVE-2009-3245Openssl improper input validation vulnerabilityOpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c, (2) crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c, (3) c…EPSS 6.5%10.0CVE-2006-3738OpenSSL SSL_get_shared_ciphers buffer overflow via long cipher listOpenSSL versions before 0.9.7l and 0.9.8d contain a buffer overflow in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function, triggered by a long list of ciphers. The …EPSS 49%analysed9.8CVE-2026-63073Openssl vulnerabilityIssue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_da…EPSS 1.2%9.8CVE-2026-48930Nodejs node.js improper access control vulnerabilityA flaw in Node.js TLS hostname handling can cause Embedded-nul hostnames can lead to silent authority rebinding due to c-string truncation in resolve…EPSS 0.34%

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2017-3732), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-26). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.