← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2015-2808 · published 1 April 2015

CVE-2015-2808: RC4 in TLS/SSL leaks plaintext via Invariance Weakness

Oracle · Communications Application Session Controller

The RC4 stream cipher, as used in TLS and SSL, fails to properly combine state data with key data during initialization, leaving the initial keystream bytes biased. A remote attacker who can sniff network traffic can recover plaintext from the first bytes of affected sessions. This is the 'Bar Mitzvah' issue, a protocol-level weakness in RC4 rather than a bug in a single product.

3.7 CVSS 3.1 Low EPSS 74% · top 0.5% CWE-327 · Broken cryptographic algorithm
3.7CVSS 3.1 base score, v2 5.0
74%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
61Affected product versions listed by NVD
202References
17 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Automated analysis

Generated by VULONE's analysis model from the NVD record, CISA KEV and EPSS data on 18 September 2026. Confidence: high.

medium priorityThe CVSS score is low (3.7) and exploitation requires a network vantage point plus specific key conditions, but the very high EPSS and broad product footprint keep it relevant for legacy environments.

What it is

The RC4 stream cipher, as used in TLS and SSL, fails to properly combine state data with key data during initialization, leaving the initial keystream bytes biased. A remote attacker who can sniff network traffic can recover plaintext from the first bytes of affected sessions. This is the 'Bar Mitzvah' issue, a protocol-level weakness in RC4 rather than a bug in a single product.

Impact

An attacker who captures traffic gains partial plaintext recovery of the initial bytes of RC4-protected streams, which can expose sensitive data such as session tokens or credentials. The confidentiality impact is limited (CVSS C:L) and no integrity or availability loss is described.

Attack surface

Reachable over the network by sniffing TLS/SSL traffic that negotiates RC4; the CVSS vector shows no privileges and no user interaction required. The attacker must be positioned to observe the encrypted stream and must catch sessions using keys affected by the Invariance Weakness.

Exploitation

Not listed in CISA KEV and no ransomware association is recorded, but EPSS is very high (0.73851, 99.45th percentile), indicating strong predicted exploitation likelihood. All references are third-party advisories and mailing lists; none are tagged as exploit code.

What to do

  • Disable RC4 cipher suites in TLS/SSL configurations on all servers and clients, prioritizing TLS 1.2+ with AEAD ciphers.
  • Apply vendor updates for the listed products (Oracle, Red Hat, Debian, SUSE, Canonical, IBM, Huawei, Fujitsu) that remove or deprioritize RC4.
  • Audit and remediate legacy appliances and firmware (e.g., ILOM, SPARC M3000 firmware) that may still offer RC4-only cipher suites.
  • Enforce cipher policy centrally and monitor for RC4 negotiation in TLS handshakes across the estate.

Detection

  • Inspect TLS handshake logs and packet captures for negotiated cipher suites containing RC4 (e.g., TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA).
  • Alert on any internal or external service still accepting RC4-based connections after the remediation window.
  • Correlate network flow records with TLS metadata to identify hosts that continue to negotiate RC4.
  • Review configuration baselines for web servers and management interfaces to confirm RC4 is disabled.

This assessment is produced automatically and is not human-reviewed. Verify against the vendor advisory before acting on it.

Affected products

61 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

LinkTags
http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 Third Party Advisory
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 Third Party Advisory
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 Third Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00031.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00039.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00040.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00046.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00047.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00000.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00004.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-01/msg00005.html Mailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143456209711959&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143629696317098&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143741441012338&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143817021313142&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143817899717054&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143818140118771&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144043644216842&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144059660127919&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144059703728085&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144060576831314&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144060606031437&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144069189622016&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144102017024820&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144104533800819&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144104565600964&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144493176821532&w=2 Issue TrackingThird Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1006.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1007.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1020.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1021.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1091.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1228.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1229.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1230.html Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1241.html Third Party Advisory

Track CVE-2015-2808 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

10.0CVE-2025-32433Erlang/OTP SSH server missing authentication allows remote code executionErlang/OTP SSH servers before OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11 and OTP-25.3.2.20 mishandle SSH protocol messages, letting an unauthenticated attacker execut…KEVEPSS 99%analysed10.0CVE-2025-24201Apple WebKit out-of-bounds write allows sandbox escapeCVE-2025-24201 is an out-of-bounds write in Apple's WebKit that was addressed with improved checks. Maliciously crafted web content may break out of …KEVEPSS 3.8%analysed10.0CVE-2021-44228Apache Log4j2 JNDI lookup remote code executionApache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) do not protect against attacker-controlled LDAP and other JNDI …KEVEPSS 100%analysed9.8CVE-2026-24061GNU Inetutils telnetd argument injection allows remote auth bypasstelnetd in GNU Inetutils through 2.7 fails to sanitize the USER environment variable, so a value such as "-f root" is passed as an argument to login …KEVEPSS 99%analysed9.8CVE-2025-39682Linux kernel TLS zero-length record handling flaw on rx_listThe Linux kernel TLS receive path mishandles zero-length records that arrive from the rx_list, breaking the assumption that a record type change cann…KEVEPSS 2.9%analysed9.8CVE-2025-24813Apache Tomcat Default Servlet path equivalence enables RCE and file disclosureApache Tomcat mishandles path equivalence for names containing an internal dot, letting a remote unauthenticated attacker write files through the Def…KEVEPSS 100%analysed9.8CVE-2024-9680Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird use-after-free in Animation timelinesA use-after-free flaw in Animation timelines allows an attacker to execute code in the content process of Firefox and Thunderbird. Mozilla reports ex…KEVEPSS 23%analysed9.8CVE-2023-46604Apache ActiveMQ OpenWire deserialization remote code executionThe Java OpenWire protocol marshaller in Apache ActiveMQ deserializes untrusted data, letting an attacker manipulate serialized class types so the br…KEVEPSS 100%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2015-2808), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-27). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.