Vulnerability record · CVE-2012-1447 · published 21 March 2012
CVE-2012-1447: Antivirus ELF parser detection bypass via modified e_version field
Aladdin · Esafe
The ELF file parser in Fortinet Antivirus, eSafe, Dr.Web and Panda Antivirus fails to properly handle a modified e_version field, allowing a crafted ELF file to evade malware detection. Because the affected component is the scanner itself, a bypass undermines the core protection these products provide. The record notes it may later be split into separate CVEs if the flaw proves independent across the different parser implementations.
Description
The ELF file parser in Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, eSafe 7.0.17.0, Dr.Web 5.0.2.03300, and Panda Antivirus 10.0.2.7 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via an ELF file with a modified e_version field. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different ELF parser implementations.
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Automated analysis
medium priorityThe flaw only bypasses detection rather than granting direct access, but it affects widely deployed AV engines and carries a high EPSS score.
What it is
The ELF file parser in Fortinet Antivirus, eSafe, Dr.Web and Panda Antivirus fails to properly handle a modified e_version field, allowing a crafted ELF file to evade malware detection. Because the affected component is the scanner itself, a bypass undermines the core protection these products provide. The record notes it may later be split into separate CVEs if the flaw proves independent across the different parser implementations.
Impact
An attacker can deliver a malicious ELF file that the antivirus engine does not flag, letting malware reach the target host undetected. The direct gain is evasion of detection rather than code execution or data access.
Attack surface
Reachable remotely over the network by supplying a crafted ELF file to the scanning engine; no authentication is required. The CVSS vector indicates medium attack complexity and no user interaction requirement, though in practice a file must be scanned or opened.
Exploitation
Not listed in CISA KEV, and no reference is tagged as exploit or proof-of-concept. EPSS is high (0.67655, 99.3rd percentile), suggesting elevated predicted exploitation activity despite the absence of confirmed public exploit code.
What to do
- Apply vendor updates for the affected antivirus products; no fixed version is stated in this record, so confirm with each vendor.
- Do not rely on a single AV engine for ELF files; add a second, independently implemented scanner or sandbox detonation.
- Block or quarantine untrusted ELF binaries at email and web gateways before they reach endpoint scanners.
- Restrict execution of ELF binaries to trusted sources and monitor for files with anomalous e_version header values.
Detection
- Hunt for ELF files with non-standard or modified e_version header values in scan logs and file repositories.
- Correlate AV scan results with sandbox or second-engine verdicts to find files that one engine misses.
- Monitor for ELF binaries arriving via email or web download that pass AV but exhibit suspicious behavior.
- Review AV engine version inventory to identify hosts still running the affected parser builds.
This assessment is produced automatically and is not human-reviewed. Verify against the vendor advisory before acting on it.
Affected products
4 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.
References
Track CVE-2012-1447 inside VULONE
Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.
Related vulnerabilities
Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.
Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2012-1447), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-27). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.