← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2011-3494 · published 16 September 2011

CVE-2011-3494: eSignal WinSig.exe buffer overflow via crafted QUO, SUM, POR or font files

Interactivedata · Esignal

WinSig.exe in eSignal 10.6.2425 and earlier contains stack-based and heap-based buffer overflows. A long StyleTemplate element in a QUO, SUM or POR file overflows the stack, and a long Font->FaceName field overflows the heap. Both can crash the application and may allow arbitrary code execution.

10.0 CVSS 2.0 High EPSS 56% · top 1.0% CWE-119 · Memory buffer overflow
10.0CVSS 2.0 base score
56%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
1Affected product versions listed by NVD
4References, 2 tagged exploit
16 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

WinSig.exe in eSignal 10.6.2425 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via (1) a long StyleTemplate element in a QUO, SUM or POR file, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow, or (2) a long Font->FaceName field (aka FaceName element), which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Automated analysis

Generated by VULONE's analysis model from the NVD record, CISA KEV and EPSS data on 19 September 2026. Confidence: medium.

high priorityThe CVSS 2.0 score is 10.0 with a network, unauthenticated vector and public exploit references, but the product is old and there is no KEV or ransomware evidence.

What it is

WinSig.exe in eSignal 10.6.2425 and earlier contains stack-based and heap-based buffer overflows. A long StyleTemplate element in a QUO, SUM or POR file overflows the stack, and a long Font->FaceName field overflows the heap. Both can crash the application and may allow arbitrary code execution.

Impact

An attacker can crash eSignal and potentially execute arbitrary code in the context of the WinSig.exe process. Successful code execution would give the attacker the privileges of the user running eSignal.

Attack surface

The flaw is reached remotely over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, per the AV:N/AC:L/Au:N vector. The attacker supplies a malicious QUO, SUM, POR or font file that WinSig.exe parses.

Exploitation

No CISA KEV listing and no ransomware association are recorded. EPSS is 0.55778 (99th percentile), and the references include an exploit advisory, indicating public exploit material exists.

What to do

  • Upgrade eSignal to a version later than 10.6.2425, or apply the vendor fix referenced in the Secunia advisory.
  • Block or restrict delivery of untrusted QUO, SUM, POR and font files to systems running eSignal.
  • Run eSignal with least privilege so a successful overflow cannot gain elevated rights.
  • Where the product is no longer supported, isolate it or retire it in favor of a maintained platform.

Detection

  • Monitor for WinSig.exe crashes and abnormal process terminations, especially when opening QUO, SUM, POR or font files.
  • Alert on WinSig.exe spawning child processes or making unexpected network connections after file parsing.
  • Inspect inbound email and file transfer channels for QUO, SUM, POR and font files with oversized StyleTemplate or FaceName fields.

This assessment is produced automatically and is not human-reviewed. Verify against the vendor advisory before acting on it.

Affected products

1 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

Track CVE-2011-3494 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

9.3CVE-2011-3503Interactivedata esignal vulnerabilityUntrusted search path vulnerability in eSignal 10.6.2425.1208, and possibly other versions, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to exe…EPSS 4.3%8.8CVE-2026-8452Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway memory buffer overflow causes DoSCVE-2026-8452 is a memory buffer overflow (CWE-119) in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway that leads to unpredictable or erroneous behavior a…KEVEPSS 1.0%analysed8.8CVE-2009-3459Adobe Reader and Acrobat heap buffer overflow via crafted PDFAdobe Reader and Acrobat 7.x before 7.1.4, 8.x before 8.1.7, and 9.x before 9.2 contain a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) triggered by a crafted…KEVEPSS 87%analysed9.8CVE-2008-4250Microsoft Windows Server service RPC path canonicalization buffer overflowThe Server service in multiple Windows versions fails to properly handle path canonicalization, allowing a crafted RPC request to overflow a buffer a…KEVEPSS 99%analysed8.8CVE-2025-31277Apple WebKit memory corruption via malicious web contentApple WebKit fails to handle memory correctly when processing crafted web content, leading to memory corruption across Safari, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tv…KEVEPSS 1.6%analysed8.8CVE-2026-3910Google Chrome V8 improper implementation allows sandbox code executionChrome before 146.0.7680.75 contains an inappropriate implementation in the V8 JavaScript engine, classified as code injection and memory buffer over…KEVEPSS 1.0%analysed8.8CVE-2008-0015Microsoft DirectShow Video ActiveX Control Stack Buffer OverflowA stack-based buffer overflow in the CComVariant::ReadFromStream function in the Active Template Library (ATL) is reachable through the MPEG2TuneRequ…KEVEPSS 77%analysed7.8CVE-2026-20700Apple OS memory corruption allows arbitrary code executionA memory corruption flaw caused by improper state management affects iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tvOS, visionOS and watchOS. Apple states it is aware of a re…KEVEPSS 1.3%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2011-3494), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-26). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.