← Vulnerability feed

Vulnerability record · CVE-2009-1943 · published 5 June 2009

CVE-2009-1943: SafeNet SoftRemote IKE service stack buffer overflow

Safenet Inc · Softremote

The IKE service (ireIke.exe) in SafeNet SoftRemote before 10.8.6 contains a stack-based buffer overflow reachable through a long request sent to UDP port 62514. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can trigger it and execute arbitrary code on the affected host. The flaw is severe because the service is network-facing and the overflow is pre-authentication.

10.0 CVSS 2.0 High EPSS 72% · top 0.6% CWE-119 · Memory buffer overflow
10.0CVSS 2.0 base score
72%EPSS exploitation probability, 30 days
NoNot in CISA KEV
2Affected product versions listed by NVD
16References
16 Jun 2026Last modified by NVD

Description

Stack-based buffer overflow in the IKE service (ireIke.exe) in SafeNet SoftRemote before 10.8.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long request to UDP port 62514.

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Automated analysis

Generated by VULONE's analysis model from the NVD record, CISA KEV and EPSS data on 18 September 2026. Confidence: medium.

critical priorityPre-authentication remote code execution in a network-facing service with a CVSS 2.0 base score of 10 and very high EPSS, though no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation is recorded.

What it is

The IKE service (ireIke.exe) in SafeNet SoftRemote before 10.8.6 contains a stack-based buffer overflow reachable through a long request sent to UDP port 62514. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can trigger it and execute arbitrary code on the affected host. The flaw is severe because the service is network-facing and the overflow is pre-authentication.

Impact

An attacker gains remote code execution with the privileges of the IKE service, potentially full control of the endpoint. No confidentiality, integrity or availability impact is excluded by the record.

Attack surface

Reached over the network via a crafted UDP packet to port 62514; the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N) indicates no authentication and no user interaction are required. The description does not state whether the port is exposed by default or how the service is deployed.

Exploitation

Not listed in CISA KEV and no ransomware association is recorded. EPSS is high (0.7221, 99.4th percentile), and references include a vendor patch advisory but no public exploit tag, so active exploitation is not confirmed by this record.

What to do

  • Upgrade SafeNet SoftRemote to 10.8.6 or later per the vendor advisory.
  • If the IKE service is not required, disable it; otherwise restrict UDP port 62514 to trusted peers only.
  • Segment or firewall hosts running SoftRemote so the IKE port is not reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for updated guidance if the product is still supported.

Detection

  • Alert on IKE traffic to UDP port 62514 from unexpected or external sources.
  • Watch for ireIke.exe crashes or process restarts that could indicate malformed request handling.
  • Hunt for anomalous child processes or network connections spawned by ireIke.exe.
  • Review firewall and IDS logs for oversized or malformed UDP payloads targeting port 62514.

This assessment is produced automatically and is not human-reviewed. Verify against the vendor advisory before acting on it.

Affected products

2 vulnerable configurations from NVD's CPE data, grouped by vendor and product.

References

Track CVE-2009-1943 inside VULONE

Watch it alongside the ransomware crews, C2 infrastructure and forum chatter that reference it, query it through the API and pull it into your SIEM over TAXII.

Start free Open in platform

Related vulnerabilities

Same products first, then exploited flaws of the same weakness class.

6.9CVE-2009-3861Safenet-inc softremote memory buffer overflow vulnerabilityStack-based buffer overflow in SafeNet SoftRemote 10.8.5 (Build 2) and 10.3.5 (Build 6), and possibly other versions before 10.8.9, allows local user…EPSS 3.7%9.5CVE-2026-88772Citrix NetScaler Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer VulnerabilityVulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 F…KEV8.8CVE-2026-8452Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway memory buffer overflow causes DoSCVE-2026-8452 is a memory buffer overflow (CWE-119) in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway that leads to unpredictable or erroneous behavior a…KEVEPSS 1.0%analysed8.8CVE-2009-3459Adobe Reader and Acrobat heap buffer overflow via crafted PDFAdobe Reader and Acrobat 7.x before 7.1.4, 8.x before 8.1.7, and 9.x before 9.2 contain a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) triggered by a crafted…KEVEPSS 87%analysed9.8CVE-2008-4250Microsoft Windows Server service RPC path canonicalization buffer overflowThe Server service in multiple Windows versions fails to properly handle path canonicalization, allowing a crafted RPC request to overflow a buffer a…KEVEPSS 99%analysed8.8CVE-2025-31277Apple WebKit memory corruption via malicious web contentApple WebKit fails to handle memory correctly when processing crafted web content, leading to memory corruption across Safari, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tv…KEVEPSS 1.6%analysed8.8CVE-2026-3910Google Chrome V8 improper implementation allows sandbox code executionChrome before 146.0.7680.75 contains an inappropriate implementation in the V8 JavaScript engine, classified as code injection and memory buffer over…KEVEPSS 1.0%analysed8.8CVE-2008-0015Microsoft DirectShow Video ActiveX Control Stack Buffer OverflowA stack-based buffer overflow in the CComVariant::ReadFromStream function in the Active Template Library (ATL) is reachable through the MPEG2TuneRequ…KEVEPSS 77%analysed

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database (record CVE-2009-1943), CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS (scores of 2026-09-26). This page is refreshed as NVD updates the record.